The Green File / La filière verte > Comment "Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404"
par Dave Winstanley, 17 Mars 2011
| Who knows which one is less harmful - but when one claims to be "non-toxic" on the label and then says don't get it on your skin, don't breath the fumes and whatever you do, don't get it in your eyes - it just shows how misleading product labeling can be. I'd keep it out of the martini's too. |
 |
par George Davidson, 18 Mars 2011
| If you look at the two ingredients its not that bad of a product, I think the warnings are just lawyer talk 01 VEGETABLE OILS MIXTURE 65.0 % 02 ISOBUTANE 75-28-5 40.0 % The percentages are less than, which leaves a 5% overlap for sloppiness - again more lawyer stuff This also is the same make-up as Pam cooking spray, which makes it a great SpudGun propellant, just not sure if the veggie oils are eatable. I would continue to use it to froth you coffee Ross, just make sure to drink it away from an open flame or sparks. George |
|
par James McKernan, 14 Août 2011
| I wonder if the production of this product is more sustainable. Perhaps non-toxic is a separate idea than sustainable or more sustainably manufactured. After all many poisons are natural, though hardly non-toxic  cheers James |
|
 |
retour |