The Green File / La filière verte > Comment "Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404" > Comment "Re: Tom's B-404"
|(And now I have mention that I didn't put in the sad faces. I cut & pasted and the included bracket and colon produced the icon. )
Edit: sign of the times... I've edited the text to avoid the "smiley" face. Mo
|Who knows which one is less harmful - but when one claims to be "non-toxic" on the label and then says don't get it on your skin, don't breath the fumes and whatever you do, don't get it in your eyes - it just shows how misleading product labeling can be.
I'd keep it out of the martini's too.
|If you look at the two ingredients its not that bad of a product, I think the warnings are just lawyer talk
01 VEGETABLE OILS MIXTURE 65.0 %
02 ISOBUTANE 75-28-5 40.0 %
The percentages are less than, which leaves a 5% overlap for sloppiness - again more lawyer stuff
This also is the same make-up as Pam cooking spray, which makes it a great SpudGun propellant, just not sure if the veggie oils are eatable.
I would continue to use it to froth you coffee Ross, just make sure to drink it away from an open flame or sparks.
|I wonder if the production of this product is more sustainable.
Perhaps non-toxic is a separate idea than sustainable or more sustainably manufactured.
After all many poisons are natural, though hardly non-toxic